DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! OpenMarket.org is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

OpenMarket.org

Jump to original thread »
Author

“Jim Crow Energy Policies”

Started by cordblomquist · 10 months ago

As Congressional energy bills make energy (and transportation) progressively more expensive, it’s worth recalling that it was cars (and carpooling) that made Martin Luther King’s Montgomery bus boycott viable.  For many black people in Montgomery, that w ... Continue reading »

4 comments

  • Michael Smith

    1 year ago

    Bravo to Niger Innis for having the courage to stand against the environmentalists that want us to commit economic suicide.

    Make no mistake about it, these jokers want mankind reduced to a bare subsistence level of existence. They are now the greatest threat to civilization we face.
    reply
  • Scott

    1 year ago

    Whenever I read commentators who refer to policies that "disproportionately harm minorities and the poor" I wonder how it is so many apparently intelligent people believe that Tiger Woods and Oprah Winfrey are being harmed to a greater degree than the majority of Americans. After all, they are "minorities." If one really means only to refer to "minorities" who are poor, then wouldn't the term "poor" by itself suffice since it has the virtue of encompassing all people who are poor?
    reply
  • Scott

    1 year ago

    Come to think of it, the title of the Innis article and its entire premise is absurd. The government's destructive energy policies are not a conspiracy to discriminate against blacks, nor do blacks or "minorities" need energy more than whites or suffer from unnecessary restrictions on energy use and production any more than whites.

    One *could* make the case that since blacks disproportionately live in urban areas that are well-served by public transportation while whites disproportionately live in suburban and rural areas that require them to commute longer distances, that whites are disproportionately hurt by rising energy costs. But that too would be an absurd argument to put forth against U.S. energy policy, even if there were a grain of truth to it, because race has nothing to do with the state of our overarching energy policy.
    reply
  • Blaids

    1 year ago

    I worked with Niger Innis and his father. The true reason Congress of Racial Equality speaks of hardship to minorities and defend the destruction of everyone’s planet (...”locked up …the Outer Continental Shelf and Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge… energy prices at the expense of consumers and workers who are laid-off from their jobs"), is because Exxon gives them huge amounts of money to keep their office afloat and pockets full.
    http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.p...
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login