DISQUS

OpenMarket.org: Forced Labor for Community Organizers

  • gary · 1 year ago
    Fascism
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    Since they are getting a diploma for their efforts, I don't see how this could be called "unpaid labor." Maybe having to go to class and take a test is also "unpaid labor"?
  • Hans Bader · 1 year ago
    The fact that you get a diploma for something doesn't make it kosher. What if your diploma was conditioned on joining a political party or Young Communist Youth Brigade or the Moral Majority?

    By the way, I am not criticizing all unpaid labor as somehow being sinister. (If you re-read the post, you will see that I noted that federal appeals courts had rejected arguments that mandatory community service constitutes involuntary servitude in violation of the 13th Amendment).

    But even assuming going to class in "unpaid labor," it stands on quite a different footing than mandatory community service, from a pragmatic vantage point. It gives the student marketable skills, and enhances the economy as a result (at least in the context of K-12 education, which has positive externalities).

    By contrast, doing some community service make-work does not so effectively impart such skills, and the mandate of community service can be used to provide free labor for political causes whose worth is not sufficient to enable them to acquire such labor on their own merits -- essentially, a government subsidy.

    Thomas Jefferson said it was sinful and tyrannical to force a man to pay money to causes he disagrees with. He might have felt the same way about forcing a man to perform unpaid labor for causes he opposes. (Of course, much of the labor supplied by a community service mandate is for causes the compelled parties are largely indifferent to, rather than hostile to, but even forcing a man to pay money to a group he is indifferent to would be regarded generally as a bad thing).
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    If community service was conditioned on adherance to some ideological or political cause it would be unconsititutional, and you know it. It isn't so conditioned, and it doesn't constitute a violation of the first amendment. The first amendemnt is the background condition of justice for all of our laws, so violations of conscience are not an issue.

    You think that going to class is socially benificial becuase it "enhances the economy". People who advocate mandatory community service believe it is socially benificial because it enhances civility. Enahcing civility is just as important, I would say more important, than churining out trained workers. "Enhancing the economy" by developing "marketable skills" is far less important than enhancing humanity by developing a sence of community. The fact that you characterize community service as "make work" says quite a bit.

    If you were honest about your ideology, you would cut to the chase and simply advocate the shutting down of free, compulsary education all together. Jefferson, by the way, was one of the orginal advocates of a form of free public education in America. Truly a man ahead of his time, and one who would not fear community servce as somehow being contrary to our collective self-interests.
  • Cori · 1 year ago
    It's not like government schools actually teach students anything. >.> They're more like babysitters than educators these days.
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    Cori, do you have any children in public schools? Or other direct experience with our public school system? Let me assure you, from personal experience, public school teachers are not mere babysitters. On the whole they are hard working, dedicated professionals and they take their responsibilities seriously and do a good job.
  • Don · 1 year ago
    I went to a high school in a town of 400 people. That's 400 in the town, not in the school. There aren't any community service organizations in the town. What's he going to do? Bus them all to the nearest large city which is 90 miles away, or are we going to make 12 year old kids pick up trash along a busy highway? How safe is that?

    The last time I checked, community service was a punishment for breaking a law. What crime did the kids do? Go to school? You're going to see kids drop out in record numbers. This should be a choice like it is now, not a requirement.
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    Dan, it's pretty apparent that you are, indeed, "community service deprived". Living in a small, bitter town with no community service opportunities has done you deep, psychological harm. But not irreparable harm! Yes, you can!

    Get out there and volunteer! It'll make a man out of you! Or at least a human being.
  • Don · 1 year ago
    Alan,
    Where in a wheat field would you suggest I volunteer? Do I help a mouse climb a hill? Help the family dog dig a hole? Howl with the occasional coyote? (It's very cool to listen to them at night!) My small town isn't bitter. Everyone knows each other and are friendly people. We greet each other by name on the street. I know the families of most of my class mates. Can you say that, or do you live in a large, bitter city where murder is common?

    Do you really approve of enslaving kids to the government? Involuntary servitude is illegal by the Constitution, but Obama doesn't agree with the Constitution. His swearing to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" in January will be a lie.

    You've been brainwashed by Obama.

    No I won't!
    Don (not Dan!)
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    Don, you are one of the creative, entrepreneurial producers of our nation! I'm sure you will be able to come up with some volunteer opportunities, if you just apply yourself! Just do it, man! YES YOU CAN!

    By the way, while the constitution does outlaw involuntary servitude, requiring community service as a condition for graduation is not involuntary servitude. You might have been lead astray by the article, which mentions "forced labor" in the title and frequently references "unpaid" labor. As Hans mentions in the article and made clear in his response to me, this requirement is not "a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment (an argument rejected by federal appeals courts)."

    Now both Obama and Hans have Juris Doctorates from Harvard - (wonder if they were in the same class?). They both know their stuff and they seem to agree on this point. So where did you get your law degree, Don?
  • Don · 1 year ago
    Alan,
    It is obvious to me now that you have hijacked this form from Hans. That's too bad. It could have been a good topic of conversation. If anyone is thinking about posting on this form, please go someplace else.

    Goodbye,
    Don
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    Goodbye Don. Please go someplace else too. Hans and I want to be alone.
  • ReACTIONary · 1 year ago
    Now that Obama's organization has "clarified" his commitment to requiring communtiy service, do we acknowledge that the the “Liberaltarians” were correct?