<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>OpenMarket.org - Latest Comments in No Indium Shortage</title><link>http://openmarket.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:19:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: No Indium Shortage</title><link>http://www.openmarket.org/2008/07/09/no-indium-shortage/#comment-2125496</link><description>As the proprietor of one of the blogs referenced by Ars Technica I'd like to introduce myself and make a couple points regarding their analysis.&lt;br&gt;In a nutshell, it's lightweight, akin to a high school sophmore trying to show off for a physics prof.&lt;br&gt;Start with "...recently lit up the blogosphere...".&lt;br&gt;There were four blogs. Small ones.&lt;br&gt;Then the false superiority in this line "Comments on blogs range from the insanely optimistic, "the invisible hand/technology will solve everything" perspective to things along the lines of "you idiots, the world is obviously doomed."&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;I prefaced my link by saying this sounded like Club of Rome stuff and ended by saying &lt;br&gt;"You know how this ends up?&lt;br&gt;We'll figure something out. That is really the only claim to fame of Homo Sapiens, singular and collectively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, it's a pretty good one."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ars Technica gives a mini-lecture on end-points in price series (duh) and goes on to a discourse in extraction of rare metals; they're a byproduct. Well double duh.&lt;br&gt;I can't speak for the other three blogs but my readers are investment banks and hedge funds. If I don't assume my readers know this stuff, they figure I'm the moron.&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;Ars Technica goes on to wrap up with three paragraphs:&lt;br&gt;"That is not to say that the supply of Indium, Gallium, and other materials are limitless...."&lt;br&gt;"...but it's possible that we can find replacements or change our technology altogether...."&lt;br&gt;"...Ultimately we need to be aware of our use of resources, but the present overreaction is not all that well-thought-out...."&lt;br&gt;.&lt;br&gt;1) Begin with hyperbole. &lt;br&gt;2) Set up the strawman.&lt;br&gt;3) Use points you found on the sites you belittle to knock the strawman down.&lt;br&gt;4) Leave with air of superiority. &lt;br&gt;I've never much cared for folks who assume their readers are ignorant of rhetoric and logic.&lt;br&gt;I'm reminded of that great line about Noam Chomsky:&lt;br&gt;"Chomsky is the intellectual for people who aren't as smart as they think they are"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Climateer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>