Community Page
- www.openmarket.org Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- This is why they're asking for projects in Iowa, at least, that are "shovel ready", that is, projects that have been in the works for several years already, that have passed all the...
- If Timothy Geithner is an example of the kind of persons that the President Elect, Barack Obama is placing in charge of Government Departments, THEN BARACK OBAMA SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE MADE...
- Several stimulus plans have been imposed yet, economy is under the same position, and we are still under recession. I know Obama is exerting too much effort to make his being proposed stimulus plan...
- Love it! As a Chevron-Texaco shareholder for 25 years, I was appalled by this ad campaign. Sandra
- So state lawmakers will start voting yea and nay in secret? No more roll call votes in the state capitol? What a load of emotional confused crap. And, of course, Federal regulations trump in any...
Jump to original thread »
Courtesy of Ivan, I’ve been directed to this press release from the Weston A. Price Foundation decrying a U.S. FDA and California Department of Food and Agriculture crackdown on purveyors of “raw” — that is, unpasteurized — milk. Now%2
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
Pasteurizing was a response to the problem created in the move to industrialize agriculture and a consequence of feeding the distillery waste from the gin mills to dairy cows. This increased acidosis and set up anaerobic environments in the cows rumen where many 'bad' bacteria thrive like e-coli 0157h. So many people got very sick.
According to Ron Schmidt author of 'The Untold Story of Milk' doctors noted with the adoption of pasteurizing increased incidents of birth defects, allergies and asthma which they attributed to the consumption of pasteurized milk!
Current knowledge about sanitation coupled with testing for bacterial counts then means that raw milk from cows fed quality feeds is superior to pasteurized milk.
Another piece of the pie comes from Udo Erasmus author of Fats that Heal and Fats that kill is that high grain feeding to the cows increases the omega 6 content of our meat and dairy skewing the ratio of omega 3 to omega 6 essential fatty acids (e.f.a.) Versus much higher levels of omega 3's in grass fed ruminants. He asserts that optimum essential fatty acid ratios are in the 2:1:1 2 omega 3 to 1 omega 6 and 9 respectively. So grain fed (fits industrial food model) is bad for us. Grass fed confers proper e.f.a. ratios and offers increased levels of conjugated linoleic acid c.l.a.(which surprise! offers us protection against atherosclerosis).
I agree with your assertion that people should be free to choose. This is based on market share increasing barriers to entry not about health concerns.
Finally milk is homogenized for one reason only and that is so that it can then sit in a bag or box on a store shelf for extended periods of time favouring the retailers.
Michael Pollan in his new book speaks about this.
For twenty years now we have known that homogenizing scars the lining of our arteries and so plaque builds up trying to heal the scarred arteries. This is known as atherosclerosis and is one of the leading causes of death in North America.
Educated consumers choose unpasteurized un homogenized grass fed milk. The food nazi's however want to 'save' us. What are your comments about the w.t.o.'s passed codex alimentaris?